BeyondTrust

Security in Context: The BeyondTrust Blog

Welcome to Security in Context

Bringing you news and commentary on solutions and strategies for protecting critical IT infrastructure in the context of your business.

Top 10 Reasons To Implement Least Privilege for Virtualized Servers

Posted December 10, 2010    Peter McCalister

In the spirit of keeping blog posts informative, short and fun, this one takes a cue from David Letterman in format.  So without further fanfare or wasted space… the Top 10 Reasons to Implement Least Privilege for Virtualized Servers are:

#10 – Sam, the CSO can now sleep nights knowing that excess privileges in virtualized environments will no longer be responsible for failing a SOX, HIPAA, PCI, DSS, GLBA or FDCC and FISMA audit (even though he isn’t required to even deal with the last two).

#9 – Andy the Auditor can get a full report of who has what entitlements, even across virtualized environments, to instantly satisfy compliance successfully instead of taking weeks of manual effort.

#8 – Ted in Tech Support won’t be able to reset file and directory permissions on any virtual server he has admin rights to so liberally that anyone with a login can access confidential data just because it makes his job easier.

#7 - Sid in Development won’t be able to download Apache applications or any otherunauthorized open source “tools” and potentially inject malware into our corporate network because he was able to commandeer his own virtual server admin credentials.

#6 - Fiona and Felix, our new VMWare administrators, won’t keeping making the sameView Composer enablement mistake.

#5 – Vito, the ever-industrious programmer and closet gamer, will not be able to run Runescape bots on our corporate virtual servers.

#4 - Alice, our outsourced VM support engineer, will no longer be responsible for DNS misconfiguration errors as her role won’t facilitate this level of admin privilege.

#3 - Fred in IT won’t be able to steal company data from our virtual servers like thatGoldman programmer and sell it to a competitor for $1M.

#2 - Sarah, the CIO, will no longer have to fear that virtual sprawl will be the next topic for a board review because policies weren’t enforced at the hypervisor admin level.

#1 – Tony, the Palo Alto VMWare administrator, will no longer be able clone virtual servers with sensitive data and then delete and remount them to bypass security and steal company secrets.

Leave a Reply

Additional articles

PowerBroker for Unix & Linux helps prevent Shellshock

Posted September 25, 2014    Paul Harper

Like many other people who tinker with UNIX and Linux on a regular basis, BASH has always been my shell of choice.  Dating back to the early days moving from Windows to a non-Windows platform, mapping the keys correctly to allow easy navigation and control helped ensure an explosion of use for the shell. Unfortunately,…

Bash “Shellshock” Vulnerability – Retina Updates

Posted September 24, 2014    BeyondTrust Research Team

A major vulnerability was recently discovered within bash which allows arbitrary command execution via specially crafted environment variables. This is possible due to the fact that bash supports the assignment of shell functions to shell variables. When bash parses environment shell functions, it continues parsing even after the closing brace of the function definition. If…

pbps-blog3

7 Reasons Customers Switch to Password Safe for Privileged Password Management

Posted September 24, 2014    Chris Burd

It’s clear that privileged password management tools are essential for keeping mission-critical data, servers and assets safe and secure. However, as I discussed in my previous post, there are several pitfalls to look out for when deploying a privileged password management solution. At this point, you may be wondering how BeyondTrust stacks up. With that,…

Tags:
, , , , ,