BeyondTrust

Security in Context: The BeyondTrust Blog

Welcome to Security in Context

Bringing you news and commentary on solutions and strategies for protecting critical IT infrastructure in the context of your business.

Role-Based Access for Your Teams

Posted May 2, 2011    Morey Haber

Regulatory controls all require the access restriction of sensitive data to the individuals that need to know. Many corporate policies also segregate users to access devices by geographical location or by platform and function. Vulnerability data is sensitive information. In the wrong hands, it provides a blueprint on how to potentially access systems without proper permissions and provisioning.  Many discussions have occurred regarding how to safeguard this data internally and how trusting you should be of a SaaS solution to house this data. Regardless of the vulnerability management solution implementation, restricting improper access to assessment data has traditionally been IP address based. That is a list of IP addresses or host names which governs who has access to what vulnerability assessment data and assets. People generally refer to these as “Sites” or “Policies”.  Within eEye we refer to them as “Smart Groups”.

In many organizations, IP addresses are not allocated per business function. Subnets can have a mix of printers, desktops, and occasionally servers. Subnets are generally allocated for the raised floor, DMZ, and other supporting infrastructure but the user space and supporting infrastructure is generally all over the board and not standardized. Many companies still do not even use standardized naming conventions for hosts and this represents another challenge for asset identification. So, how do you build role based access for a Desktop Administrator when they may have a dynamic IP list to manage; especially in consideration of DHCP? How would you delegate VA data to the infrastructure team for let’s say for only Cisco devices? Do you even have a list of all the devices that can be imported and is it maintained regularly for corrected assessment and ultimately proper role based access?

In a previous blog, I discussed advanced targeting techniques with Retina CS and how a Smart Group can be constructed on any OS, software installed, patterns in the host name, etc. Consider this technique also applies to the Role Based Access Model within Retina CS. Various Smart Groups can be constructed for only Desktop Operating Systems, Windows Servers, Red Hat Linux, or even only Cisco Devices completely independent of the IP addresses assigned to them. Retina CS will maintain the group automatically with each subsequent scan of the target and keep them up to date regardless of host name or any other traditional “Site” based techniques. The User Based Security Model within Retina CS allows you then to assign User Groups to the Smart Groups and control access based on business function rather than just traditional IP space. If users are uncomfortable with that model, Smart Groups can be built from Address Groups and Active Directory just like any other traditional VA solution or even better, a combination of both! Users can be restricted to a certain platform or device type and the IP range it may be present in. For an enterprise environment, this is priceless. A remote office can have VA data solely for a Desktop Admin in the building he/she works in regardless of DHCP and device type; workstation or laptop.

 

Consider that role based access for your vulnerability assessment data means so much more in the proper hands rather than in the wrong hands. It can improve your overall security posture and make sure individual teams are response for their security patches and not just the security team providing reports on how to fix the problem. Role based access is a fundamental part of Retina CS and will help you change the way you manage vulnerability data within your environment; secure, role based, and business function delegated. For more information on Retina CS, please click here.

Leave a Reply

Additional articles

CyberResiliency

6 things I like about Gartner’s Cyber Resiliency Strategy

Posted August 27, 2015    Nigel Hedges

There were 6 key principles, or recommendations, that Gartner suggested were important drivers towards a great cyber resiliency posture. I commented more than once during the conference that many of these things were not new. They are all important recommendations that are best when placed together and given to senior management and the board – a critical element of organisations that desperately need to “get it”.

Tags:
,
powerbroker-difference-1

Why Customers Choose PowerBroker: Flexible Deployment Options

Posted August 26, 2015    Scott Lang

BeyondTrust commissioned a study of our customer base in early 2015 to determine how we are different from other alternatives in the market. What we learned was that there were six key differentiators that separate BeyondTrust from other solution providers in the market. We call it the PowerBroker difference,

Tags:
, ,
Mac-Security-Enterprise

On Demand Webinar: Security Risk of Mac OS X in the Enterprise

Posted August 20, 2015    BeyondTrust Software

In the last several years, Mac administrators have come to realize that they may be just as vulnerable to exploits and malware as most other operating systems. New malware and adware is released all the time, and there have been serious vulnerabilities patched by Apple in the past several years, some of which may afford attackers full control of your systems.

Tags:
, ,