BeyondTrust

Security in Context: The BeyondTrust Blog

Welcome to Security in Context

Bringing you news and commentary on solutions and strategies for protecting critical IT infrastructure in the context of your business.

Predicting Insider Threats

Posted July 19, 2011    Peter McCalister

In the movie Minority Report, police have created a system which predicts crime before it happens in a nightmarish Orwellian scenario. But what if companies could predict who would attack their most valuable assets? What kinds of ethical considerations would arise?

While insider threats are less in number, when they do happen the damage is generally far greater than an outside attack. According to the 2011 CyberSecurity Watch Survey conducted by CSO Magazine and Deloitte, annual monetary losses from breaches average approximately $123,000 per organization.

This past year WikiLeaks has brought new meaning to the concept of insider threat by providing a convenient vehicle to empower staff at government agencies and public/private corporations to quickly and instantly hand over their privileged information to the world.

Researchers at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory believe that combining traditionally monitored cyber security data with other kinds of organizational data is one option or inferring the motivations of individuals, which may in turn allow early prediction and mitigation of insider threats. While unproven outside the lab, researchers believe that this combination of data may yield better results than either cyber security or organizational data would in isolation. However, this nontraditional approach yields inevitable conflicts between security interests of the organization and privacy interests of individuals.

Should warning signs of a potential malicious insider be addressed before a malicious event has occurred to prevent harm to the organization and discouragethe insider from violating the organization’s rules? Predictive approaches cannot be validated a priori; false accusations may harm the career of the accused; and collection/monitoring of certain types of data may adversely affect employee morale.

While predicting insider threats makes for an interesting movie plot, the best bet for organizations in this day and age is to implement privileged identity management solutions to create boundaries that enable end users and applications to communicate freely within an IT environment without worry of intentional, accidental or indirect misuse of privilege.

Leave a Reply

Additional articles

Larry-Brock-CISO

Passwords: A Hacker’s Best Friend

Posted September 1, 2015    Larry Brock

After all the years of talk about biometrics and multi-factor authentication, we still have passwords and will likely have them for a long time. Because many “high risk” systems require complex passwords (zk7&@1c6), most people that use them believe their passwords are secure. But they aren’t.

Tags:
, ,
CyberResiliency

6 things I like about Gartner’s Cyber Resiliency Strategy

Posted August 27, 2015    Nigel Hedges

There were 6 key principles, or recommendations, that Gartner suggested were important drivers towards a great cyber resiliency posture. I commented more than once during the conference that many of these things were not new. They are all important recommendations that are best when placed together and given to senior management and the board – a critical element of organisations that desperately need to “get it”.

Tags:
,
powerbroker-difference-1

Why Customers Choose PowerBroker: Flexible Deployment Options

Posted August 26, 2015    Scott Lang

BeyondTrust commissioned a study of our customer base in early 2015 to determine how we are different from other alternatives in the market. What we learned was that there were six key differentiators that separate BeyondTrust from other solution providers in the market. We call it the PowerBroker difference,

Tags:
, ,