BeyondTrust

Security In Context

Bringing you news and commentary on solutions and strategies for protecting your critical IT infrastructure.

Multiple Platform Configuration Compliance

Post by Morey Haber April 27, 2011

Here is the problem. Most small businesses benefit from picking a standard platform like Microsoft Windows and exclusively using it from laptops to servers. There has always been, even in the smallest companies, some resistance to Windows including the  rogue Mac users. Enterprises tend to pick the platform they need based on business requirements and standardization, and using the same platform becomes a secondary or even tertiary consideration. I am sure many of you have seen companies with “one of everything” and we use “these” platforms and if your application does not support it, we will not license “your” technology. It is similar to the infamous “religious” battle you hear between Windows and Unix staff. So with such a diverse requirement for monitoring proper configuration compliance, what is a business supposed to do? The small business can pick a simple tool, but an enterprise is left finding something that meets their unique needs. So, do they use different tools for different platforms? Deploy agents and entire infrastructure to support it? Or, use one tool that can serve multiple functions and platforms?

If you have read my blogs before, you will see that we promote using one tool for multiple functions within a business. Recently, with the release of Retina CS 2.1 and the Retina Network Security Scanner 5.12.0, we have begun to tackle the problem of configuration compliance on multiple platform platforms. Using OVAL as assessment language, eEye has expanded configuration compliance to Linux and has embarked on a strategic solution to support Unix and network devices all from one product. Vulnerability assessment and configuration compliance no longer need to be separate tools and no longer needs to be different products or agents depending on the platforms your business has selected to deploy and support.

In addition, eEye’s Configuration Compliance Add-On Module simplifies this process by shipping OVAL guidelines for  FDCC, NIST, Microsoft, USGCB, RHEL, and importing third party guidelines from organizations like CIS.  With all the templates directly in the solution, you’ll find it easier than ever to audit configuration settings against internal policies or external best practices, and to centralize reporting for monitoring and regulatory purposes. Below are some of the benefits of multiple platform configuration compliance within a vulnerability scanning solution:

  • Single console approach ensures a more stable and secure infrastructure, proactively reducing the risks of security breaches and lowering costs by enabling enterprise-wide management.
  • Configuration assessment for critical security settings that include audit settings, security settings, user rights, logging configuration, etc.
  • Streamlined reporting for government and corporate standards with built-in vulnerability reporting and integration with Retina Insight for delta dashboards and drilldowns.
  • Simple wizard for benchmark compliance leveraging a robust library of industry benchmarks encapsulating industry knowledge and experience.
  • Built-in templates for configuration compliance from FDCC, NIST, STIGS, USGCB, RHEL, and Microsoft.
  • OVAL 5.3 SCAP-certified scan engine and interpreter and OVAL 5.8 compatible for additional platform support.

Please contact us for more information on how your organization can benefit from multiple platform configuration compliance. eEye is pioneering the next-generation Unified Vulnerability Management solution and supporting a full- function, multi-platform configuration compliance engine and vulnerability assessment solution in one product. eEye believes in simplifying vulnerability management.

Leave a Reply

Additional articles

BI-Qualys-Connector-IMG1

Getting More Value from QualysGuard Vulnerability Data with BeyondInsight v5.1

If your vulnerability assessment scans can’t produce meaningful and actionable reports, performing a scan does no good for anyone. If you’ve read my other blog posts, you know I have no qualms about stating that BeyondTrust provides the best vulnerability reporting in the industry. Ask your favorite analyst and they’ll tend to agree. Of course,…

Post by Morey Haber April 18, 2014
Tags:
, , , , , , , ,
insider-threat-fed

Mitigating Inside Threats to U.S. Federal IT Environments

Recent high-profile cases have increased the perceived risks that go along with disclosure and usage of confidential information. One of the most difficult security threats to mitigate is an attack from the inside. When an over-privileged user, such as an unhappy current or former employee, contractor, or consultant, begins navigating your network, how will you…

Post by BeyondTrust Software April 17, 2014
Tags:
, , , , ,

Are you a Target? Investigating Security Breaches with Kevin Johnson

Last week, over 1,000 IT security professionals watched as Kevin Johnson, CEO of Secure Ideas, presented his expert opinion on lessons learned from recent, high-profile retail breaches. Here’s a summary of key takeaways from the webcast plus an on-demand recording of the full, 60-minute presentation. Understanding the “why” behind attacks According to Kevin, the primary…

Post by Chris Burd April 17, 2014
Tags:
, , , , ,