BeyondTrust

Security in Context: The BeyondTrust Blog

Welcome to Security in Context

Bringing you news and commentary on solutions and strategies for protecting critical IT infrastructure in the context of your business.

EMET 4.0: Adding a Layer to the Security Onion

Posted June 19, 2013    BeyondTrust Research Team

With the release of the EMET 4.0 beta back in April, it’s no surprise that there has been a lot of buzz lately around Microsoft’s Enhanced Mitigation Experience Toolkit (EMET). Now, after some delay, the beta testing is over and the brand new, and very shiny, EMET v4 has been released.

The latest version of EMET introduces several features that address many of the techniques used in high profile attacks over the last few years. Features such as “Certificate Trust” allow users to configure a custom set of rules for implementing Certificate Pinning for various SSL certificates. This helps prevents man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks that take advantage of the shortcomings of the SSL, which have gained quite a bit of attention in the past few years, with incidents such as the DigiNotar fiasco.

Additionally, several memory protection enhancements were added for the purpose of proactively detecting exploitation of both known and unknown vulnerabilities. These protection mechanisms primarily center on detection and prevention of ROP-based exploits. Using these memory protection enhancements, EMET is even able to detect and prevent an ASLR/DEP bypass that was shown off at this year’s CanSecWest security conference.

EMET can be put into an “Audit mode” that will stop it from blocking offending processes, and instead report when a rule is triggered. This allows for compatibility testing before mass deployment and makes it much more realistic to be used as a reporting device if active blocking is too severe for a specific workstation. After rules are developed, EMET can be pushed out and managed through Group Policy.

As with any mitigation or protection mechanism, there is usually going to be some technique that bypasses the defense. After all, this is a never-ending struggle in a fight to secure highly valuable data. However, this does add on an additional layer that attackers will need to plan for and attempt to bypass. It becomes especially valuable in situations where legacy software is involved, when uninstalling just isn’t an option. In order to help secure your environment, we recommend that you at least test out EMET, and if it works for you, get it deployed as soon as possible. In order to help with the process, you can use your trusty Retina Network Security Scanner (audit ID 19247 & 19248) to locate machines on your network that do not yet have EMET deployed on them.

Tags:
, ,

Leave a Reply

Additional articles

dave-shackleford-headshot

Privileged Passwords: The Bane of Security Professionals Everywhere

Posted February 19, 2015    Dave Shackleford

Passwords have been with us since ancient times. Known as “watchwords”, ancient Roman military guards would pass a wooden tablet with a daily secret word engraved from one shift to the next, with each guard position marking the tablet to indicate it had been received. The military has been using passwords, counter-passwords, and even sound…

Tags:
, , ,
Privileged Account Management Process

In Vulnerability Management, Process is King

Posted February 18, 2015    Morey Haber

You have a vulnerability scanner, but where’s your process? Most organizations are rightly concerned about possible vulnerabilities in their systems, applications, networked devices, and other digital assets and infrastructure components. Identifying vulnerabilities is indeed important, and most security professionals have some kind of scanning solution in place. But what is most essential to understand is…

Tags:
, , , , ,
bank theft img

The Vulnerabilities and Privileges of Carbanak Bank Thieves

Posted February 17, 2015    BeyondTrust Research Team

Recently Kaspersky released analysis of a series of significant breaches against financial institutions by a group they have dubbed Carbanak. The attacks go back over 2 years and estimates are that potentially $1 billion dollars in total were stolen from more than 100 financial institutions. In some cases the attackers were active in victim organizations between…

Tags:
, , ,