Security in Context: The BeyondTrust Blog

Welcome to Security in Context

Bringing you news and commentary on solutions and strategies for protecting critical IT infrastructure in the context of your business.

Computerworld’s Advice Still Relies Too Much on Trust

Posted November 17, 2010    Peter McCalister

In a Computerworld article, last week, exploring the ‘scary side of virtualization’, the reporter, took some time out in a sidebar, to offer some sage staffing advice.

His riposte, ‘Beware the All-Powerful Admin’, made clear the risk of giving server admins the ‘keys to the kingdom’ – not a good thing so consultants and IT execs unanimously agree.

They might for example create virtual FTP servers ‘or they may inadvertently use a virtual-machine migration tool to move a server onto different hardware for maintenance reasons, without realizing that the new host is on an untrusted network segment.’

His sage advice, is to establish a clear separation of duties in virtual infrastructures, and develop a strong change-management process that includes issuing change management tickets.

BeyondTrust, naturally would agree, but with one caveat. Businesses don’t rely on trust alone. BeyondTrust’s name doesn’t invite businesses to put their faith in some kind of metaphysical state that transcends our human frailties, it simply invites you to recognize that people can and do make mistakes, and when they are people with the ‘keys to the kingdom’, these mistakes can be costly.

Better to trust your people, and, take out an insurance policy against human frailties, whether those be fat fingered mistakes, or willful misuse of responsibility.

In any environment especially the deployment of virtualized environments, strong identity management practices, and specifically control around privileged access, must be put in place. As BeyondTrust’s Jeff Nielsen says: “As the number of virtual hosts increases, there is a natural tendency to create islands of identity that are difficult to manage. As individual virtual servers are created that serve the needs of departmental applications, there will be typically be a push from the departments for them to own the access to the server, specifically the privileged access, in the name of departmental efficiency. As the number of identity sources increases, the prospect for orphaned or inappropriate privileged access increases. Without a well-orchestrated management scheme for identity management and privileged access, the company will soon lose control compromising security and audit compliance.”

Leave a Reply

Additional articles


Answering the age-old question, ‘What’s plugged into my network?’

Posted October 9, 2015    Alejandro DaCosta

“What’s plugged into my network?” is a question I hear frequently from security administrators. And, really, it’s no surprise why. No longer do we have to account just for the physical servers in our datacenters, workstations and a few network devices. Now we need to keep track of roaming laptops, dynamic virtual systems, off-site cloud deployments and BYOD.


Closing the Vulnerability Gap

Posted October 7, 2015    Brian Chappell

Managing vulnerabilities is a significant challenge for many organizations. The main difficulties with managing this manifest in two key areas. The first is that the list isn’t static. The second is priority.


Scottrade Breach: Identified by Federal Officials

Posted October 5, 2015    Morey Haber

Late afternoon on October 2nd, news leaked out of another large security breach, now at Scottrade. The identity count of records, in the millions again (4.6 million is the latest). This breach comes on the second day of national CyberSecurity month, the first being Experian/T-Mobile breach.