BeyondTrust

Security in Context: The BeyondTrust Blog

Welcome to Security in Context

Bringing you news and commentary on solutions and strategies for protecting critical IT infrastructure in the context of your business.

Building Automated Vulnerability Audit Groups

Posted September 20, 2013    Bill Tillson

From time to time, the field engineering team and I see the same request cross our desks in a short period of time. This time it was how to remove certain types of audits from running when performing a vulnerability scan originating from Retina CS. The old way of doing things would have required the user to manage the scan report templates, verify the audit group the that particular scan report template was using, and then modify that audit group. This type of modification requires that the user go through the audit group and find each audit that they didn’t want to run and deselect them from that audit group. Since the audits were all focused on “default password”, “default credentials”, or “default user”, we started searching for these audits within the Retina CS audit group management.
Building Audit Groups

Realizing this wasn’t a very efficient process (as we discovered many related audits we needed to disable), we were wondering if there was a simpler way to do this. Surprisingly, this kind of thing can be handled quite efficiently by Retina CS. The answer is Vulnerability Smart Rules.

The idea behind this is to utilize an existing audit group within Retina CS, say the “All Audits” group and then define what kind of audits you don’t want in your new Vulnerability Audit Group based on something like a word in the description within the audit. The example below shows how to define the rule containing our parameters for the new Vulnerability Audit Group:
Building Audit Groups

Now that the audit group has been defined to not contain any audits that contain the “default user”, “default creds” or “default password”, we can search to ensure none of these audits are found within the new audit group created:
Building Audit Groups

We can then tie this audit group to our scan report template that we want by dragging our new Vulnerability Audit Group to our audit group selection within our report ensuring that these audits will not be included:
Building Audit Groups

This technique will automatically keep the Audit Group up to date with the latest audits and add or remove them when things change. It is a simple technique that shows the advance power of Retina CS and automating scans based on what checks to perform (or not perform) for your individual business needs. For more information on Retina CS, please click. The field engineers and I would be happy to show you this can reduce the time it takes to maintain your scan jobs.

Tags:
, , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Additional articles

veritas-logo

BeyondTrust to be acquired by Veritas Capital

Posted September 2, 2014    Mike Yaffe

We’re pleased to announce that Veritas Capital plans to acquire BeyondTrust. This is positive news for everyone associated with BeyondTrust, as it will spur significant investments in our Privileged Account Management and Vulnerability Management solutions. Rest assured that the BeyondTrust management team will remain intact, and there will be no changes to the company name,…

Tags:
, ,
PBPS-screenshot-blog aug2014

Failing the Security Basics: Backoff Point-of-Sale Malware

Posted August 22, 2014    Marc Maiffret

At the beginning of this month, US-CERT issued a security alert relating to a string of breaches that had been targeting Point of Sale (POS) systems. The alert details that attackers were leveraging brute forcing tools to target common remote desktop applications such as Microsoft’s Remote Desktop, Apple Remote Desktop, Splashtop and LogMeIn among others….

Tags:
, , , , , ,

Troubleshooting Windows Privilege Management Rules with Policy Monitor

Posted August 21, 2014    Jason Silva

When defining and testing PowerBroker for Windows rules for production or pilots, customers sometimes tell us, “I don’t think this policy / program is working.” This is usually a case of the policy not properly triggering because of the way the rule was created. A unique feature of PowerBroker for Windows compared to other solutions is a client-side…

Tags:
, , ,