BeyondTrust

Security in Context: The BeyondTrust Blog

Welcome to Security in Context

Bringing you news and commentary on solutions and strategies for protecting critical IT infrastructure in the context of your business.

Beware The Risk Of The Vulnerable Corporate Desktop

Posted February 10, 2012    Peter McCalister

Anyone who has spent any time at all in the cyber-security space knows that hackers and creators of malware don’t rest for an instant. The harder the IT security world works to stay ahead of the cyber-criminals (or, more accurately, to keep pace or catch up to them), the faster increasingly sophisticated attacks burst into corporate networks, infecting servers and endpoints and running IT teams ragged as they chase the threats and remediate the resultant carnage.

Why, with all the efforts IT organizations put forth to stop these external threats, do these attacks continue to rampage corporate infrastructures? Even if a company is spared the uncomfortable action of publicly acknowledging the loss of sensitive data through a breach, IT managers routinely sweat the close calls, the bullets dodged, the inevitable dalayed another day.

It’s no surprise that many of these attacks prey on the desktop, where a single mistake in user behavior can bring upon a malicious attack in an instant. Laptops turned to botnet hosts. Trojan horses transported stealthily to corporate servers, poised to steal customer data. Viruses and worms launched and spreading through networks like wildfire. So IT teams (over 99% of them) religiously deploy anti-virus software and keep it updated. And that stops a lot of attacks – but not nearly all of them, or the worst of them.

Perhaps that’s why more and more IT organizations are coming to a critical realization: that these attacks, while external in nature, often are brought on by internal people – often completely unknown to them. Just a single mistake in user behavior is all it takes.

When it comes to protecting employees from making such mistakes (preventing good people from doing bad things, you might say), it pays to consider a programmatic approach: adopt a least privilege strategy, granting users only standard rights but permitting elevation of privileges as required to enable them to do their jobs effectively. When you combine such privilege management with fine-grained application control (whitelisting), you add yet another layer of protection. After all, cyber-criminals are pros at getting people to do things they shouldn’t. What better defense is there than removing the opportunity to take a risky action in the first place?

Leave a Reply

Additional articles

Are Your Data Security Efforts Focused in the Right Area?

Posted January 28, 2015    Scott Lang

Vormetric Data Security recently released an insider threat report, with research conducted by HarrisPoll and analyzed by Ovum. Based on the survey responses, it is apparent that there is still a great deal of insecurity over data. However, the results also show that there may be misplaced investments to address those insecurities. I will explain…

Tags:
ghost

GHOST Vulnerability…Scary Indeed

Posted January 28, 2015    BeyondTrust Research Team

A vulnerability discovered by Qualys security researchers has surfaced within the GNU C Library that affects virtually all Linux operating systems. The vulnerability lies within the various gethostbyname*() functions and, as such, has been dubbed “GHOST.” GHOST is particularly nasty considering remote, arbitrary code execution can be achieved. In an effort to avoid taxing DNS lookups, glibc developers introduced…

Tags:
,
dave-shackleford-headshot

Your New Years Resolution: Controlling Privileged Users

Posted January 27, 2015    Dave Shackleford

Is 2015 the year you get a better handle on security? The news last year was grim – so much so, in fact, that many in the information security community despaired a bit. Really, the end-of-the-year infosec cocktail parties were a bit glum. OK, let’s be honest, infosec cocktail parties are usually not that wild…

Tags:
, , ,