BeyondTrust

Security in Context: The BeyondTrust Blog

Welcome to Security in Context

Bringing you news and commentary on solutions and strategies for protecting critical IT infrastructure in the context of your business.

Better Security Management with a Consolidated View of AV and Vulnerabilities

Posted May 19, 2011    Alejandro DaCosta

We expect our smart phones to handle all of our business needs: phone calls, voicemail, email, and calendar functionality, at the very least. Why not expect the same consolidated approach with your security products? Take for example the relationship between vulnerabilities and malware. Most of the malware, trojans, worms, etc., get into a system by exploiting vulnerabilities in applications such as Adobe, IE, Firefox, etc. Vulnerabilities and malware really have a strong correlation and so should the products that manage each one. 

Here at eEye, we have taken this consolidated approach for years, first with the introduction of the REM management console and most recently with Retina CS. These consoles, at their core, allow an IT professional to easily manage endpoint protection agents as wells as vulnerability assessment data from a single location.

eEye’s unified approach comes with many benefits:

  • Lower total cost of ownership
  • One central console, a single server or appliance
  • Correlated reporting that includes vulnerability and attack data
  • Risk assessment of both vulnerability and attack data
  • A shorter learning curve with a single application
  • A single dashboard depicting your true security posture
  • Unfortunately, I have seen many environments where there is a disconnect between vulnerability management and endpoint protection. In some cases, vulnerability assessment is not part of the picture at all! These environments also tend to rely just on an anti-virus application for protection. This is equivalent to saying, “Let the vulnerabilities I don’t know of be exploited and let the malware be delivered. I only want to be protected against known threats and I want this protection to occur once the malware is on my system and has subsequently triggered a signature.”  I’m not saying that you should not have an anti-virus, but rather that your endpoint protection agent should combine an AV layer with other layers of protection.  These other layers should not be signature-based and should provide Zero-Day protection.  Blink, eEye’s endpoint protection solution, is a clear example of this. Blink takes a multi-layered approach to security and combines vulnerability assessment as part of its package. 

    Want a consolidated view of your environment? See an On-demand Demo of Retina CS.

    Leave a Reply

    Additional articles

    Sudo_logo

    Don’t Create a Different sudoers File for Each System

    Posted May 20, 2015    Randy Franklin Smith

    What if you have multiple Linux and/or Unix systems? Sudo management can become onerous and unwieldy if you try to manage a different sudoers file on each system. The good news is that sudo supports multiple systems.

    password-safety

    What Does Microsoft Local Administrator Password Solution Really Do?

    Posted May 19, 2015    Morey Haber

    LAPS is a feature that allows the randomization of local administrator accounts across the domain. Although it would seem that this capability overlaps with features in BeyondTrust’s PowerBroker Password Safe (PBPS), the reality is it is more suited for simple use cases such as changing the local Windows admin account and not much more.

    Tags:
    , ,
    webinar_ondemand

    On Demand Webinar: Securing Windows Server with Security Compliance Manager

    Posted May 14, 2015    BeyondTrust Software

    On Demand Webinar: Security Expert Russell Smith, explains how to use Microsoft’s free Security Compliance Manager (SCM) tool to create and deploy your own security baselines, including user and computer authentication settings.

    Tags:
    , ,