BeyondTrust

Security in Context: The BeyondTrust Blog

Welcome to Security in Context

Bringing you news and commentary on solutions and strategies for protecting critical IT infrastructure in the context of your business.

Better Security Management with a Consolidated View of AV and Vulnerabilities

Posted May 19, 2011    Alejandro DaCosta

We expect our smart phones to handle all of our business needs: phone calls, voicemail, email, and calendar functionality, at the very least. Why not expect the same consolidated approach with your security products? Take for example the relationship between vulnerabilities and malware. Most of the malware, trojans, worms, etc., get into a system by exploiting vulnerabilities in applications such as Adobe, IE, Firefox, etc. Vulnerabilities and malware really have a strong correlation and so should the products that manage each one. 

Here at eEye, we have taken this consolidated approach for years, first with the introduction of the REM management console and most recently with Retina CS. These consoles, at their core, allow an IT professional to easily manage endpoint protection agents as wells as vulnerability assessment data from a single location.

eEye’s unified approach comes with many benefits:

  • Lower total cost of ownership
  • One central console, a single server or appliance
  • Correlated reporting that includes vulnerability and attack data
  • Risk assessment of both vulnerability and attack data
  • A shorter learning curve with a single application
  • A single dashboard depicting your true security posture
  • Unfortunately, I have seen many environments where there is a disconnect between vulnerability management and endpoint protection. In some cases, vulnerability assessment is not part of the picture at all! These environments also tend to rely just on an anti-virus application for protection. This is equivalent to saying, “Let the vulnerabilities I don’t know of be exploited and let the malware be delivered. I only want to be protected against known threats and I want this protection to occur once the malware is on my system and has subsequently triggered a signature.”  I’m not saying that you should not have an anti-virus, but rather that your endpoint protection agent should combine an AV layer with other layers of protection.  These other layers should not be signature-based and should provide Zero-Day protection.  Blink, eEye’s endpoint protection solution, is a clear example of this. Blink takes a multi-layered approach to security and combines vulnerability assessment as part of its package. 

    Want a consolidated view of your environment? See an On-demand Demo of Retina CS.

    Leave a Reply

    Additional articles

    webinar1

    On Demand Webinar: Advanced Windows Tracing

    Posted April 17, 2015    BeyondTrust Software

    Webinar: Security MVP, Paula Januszkiewicz, shows Windows administrators how to be more aware of what happens whenever somebody does something within the system.

    Tags:
    , ,
    5

    The Delicate Art of Remote Checks – A Glance Into MS15-034

    Posted April 15, 2015    Bill Finlayson

    Remote vulnerability detection – using ms15-034 as an example.

    Tags:
    , ,
    databreach

    2015 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report: More End Users as Threats

    Posted April 15, 2015    Scott Lang

    The 2015 Verizon report says end users are the number one source of insider abuse incidents. Find out how to mitigate the risks.

    Tags:
    ,